PDA

View Full Version : A Resistance Review: 9.1 From IGN


Variable Gear
10-28-2008, 06:11 PM
I found a review of Resistance on the interwebs, with IGN (http://ps3.ign.com/articles/745/745206p1.html) giving the game a 9.1.
The real stars of the show, however, are the weapons. As Insomniac has proven before with its Ratchet and Clank series, this team knows how to design varied and interesting instruments of destruction and have done so again here. Whether you're wielding the game's first weapon or its last, there's always a new gun to shoot or a new tactic to try out (it's likely impossible to finish the game using only one or two selections, you'll have to use most if not all weapons at multiple points). Just a few examples of what players can expect: A sniper rifle that can slow down time (L23 Fareye), cannons that shoot needle-like subsonic bolts which bounce off surfaces (XR-005 Hailstorm), and a mine-launcher that shoots organic slime bombs that can be detonated remotely as makeshift plastic explosives. There are more than a dozen different weapons like these in all, including a hidden assortment that won't unlock until you've beaten the game.
http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/745/745206/resistance-fall-of-man-20061110064417702-000.jpg
As great as the weapons are, they wouldn't matter much if the enemies you faced off against didn't provide any kind of resistance (ahem). The good news is that the enemies ARE tough. In fact, the AI in Resistance is pretty decent and it makes for quite a challenging time. Some Chimeran soldiers, for example, are smart enough to take cover, change strategic positions, or team up with other monsters in an effort to kill you dead. Granted, their level of intelligence isn't going to blow you away (a large portion of the "first half" enemies dawdle about just waiting to be shot after ambushing you), but it's still good enough to offer surprises and should give even veterans of the genre a thumb workout. Oh, and there's a huge variety of enemies too -- from low-level grunts and Ghostbuster-like demon dogs to enormous cannon-wielding giants and towering spider-creatures.
Two years ago...

Schnoogs
10-28-2008, 06:12 PM
This is random

Codicier
10-28-2008, 06:13 PM
Am I missing something? Why did you make a thread out of this?

Schnoogs
10-28-2008, 06:15 PM
IGN reviews Quake 3 (http://pc.ign.com/articles/164/164625p1.html)

Variable Gear
10-28-2008, 06:16 PM
Why do we need to make review-exclusive threads? This thread is a literal argument against the practice. Encase the review discussion within the general game thread, and I won't complain.

Schnoogs
10-28-2008, 06:17 PM
Why do we need to make review-exclusive threads? This thread is a literal argument against the practice. Encase the review discussion within the general game thread, and I won't complain.

So by posting the review for a game that came out 2 years ago you're somehow illustrating what exactly? :confused:

Codicier
10-28-2008, 06:18 PM
Why do we need to make review-exclusive threads? This thread is a literal argument against the practice. Encase the review discussion within the general game thread, and I won't complain.

So you made a separate thread to argue against making separate threads?

Edit: Damn it Schnoogs, give someone else a chance to be a jerk for once. :p

Schnoogs
10-28-2008, 06:20 PM
So you made a separate thread to argue against making separate threads?

We call that "deep and profound hypocrisy" :p

Variable Gear
10-28-2008, 06:22 PM
So you made a separate thread to argue against making separate threads?
I made a thread in order to illustrate my point that these review threads are unnecessary. I could have argued my point in all the review threads, but I chose this idea instead.

OldJadedGamer
10-28-2008, 06:23 PM
edit.. this is in the console thread and apparently, I can't read.

Gorvi
10-28-2008, 06:29 PM
I laughed. :p

Variable Gear
10-28-2008, 06:31 PM
I laughed. :p
That was the second intention of this thread, so the fact that you laughed makes me feel good.

Gorvi
10-28-2008, 06:56 PM
That was the second intention of this thread, so the fact that you laughed makes me feel good.
That's cool. :) I agree with you for the most part. The only reason I like to see the reviews like these is that at last you finally get some good information on a game. While it may be a bit hyperbolic, you get more honest info than you do from the worthless press pieces that most previews are these days.

King3567
10-28-2008, 06:58 PM
Thank you Variable. I've been arguing the same thing too. Down with multiple threads talking about the same game! If you people have something cool to post, it isn't necessary to make an entire new thread and do some research before you post! It only takes a minute.

Variable Gear
10-28-2008, 06:59 PM
That's cool. :) I agree with you for the most part. The only reason I like to see the reviews like these is that at last you finally get some good information on a game. While it may be a bit hyperbolic, you get more honest info than you do from the worthless press pieces that most previews are these days.
The preview scene is changing, but I'll agree that the majority of them are far too soft.

Dukefrukem
10-28-2008, 07:03 PM
I get the point, and it's quite funny.

King3567
10-28-2008, 07:09 PM
That's cool. :) I agree with you for the most part. The only reason I like to see the reviews like these is that at last you finally get some good information on a game. While it may be a bit hyperbolic, you get more honest info than you do from the worthless press pieces that most previews are these days.

I'm fine with soft previews (just not as hyperbolic as Game Informer) because, unless it's a month or two before the game's release, it is a preview build. I've noticed that Joystiq is actually pretty honest with their previews from what little I've read.

BLeeP
10-28-2008, 07:15 PM
The way I remember it, these topics used to be started for a game and then lead to hype for that game (if the review was good, obviously), and finally, once it was out, all discussion for that game stayed in the original review topic. I suppose that has changed, but, then again, we are used to seeing much higher post counts ^_~.

MalReynolds
10-29-2008, 05:48 AM
9.1 why didnt they give it a 10 jesus XD

President Fred
10-29-2008, 05:55 AM
9.1 why didnt they give it a 10 jesus XD
Well I guess I wont have bought it.

MalReynolds
10-29-2008, 07:21 AM
i was jokin a 9.1 is good by'

President Fred
10-29-2008, 07:23 AM
i was jokin a 9.1 is good by'
I know, I was also joking I don't really have the ability to travel back in time and stop myself from buying resistance.