View Full Version : Recent DirecTV Ad
fitbabits
10-20-2008, 04:17 PM
Am I the only one who finds it sickening that DirecTV are using a dead child in their latest advertising campaign (the one that's bases on Poltergeist)?
Heather O'Rourke (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_O%27Rourke), [the] actress who played Carol Anne in all three Poltergeist movies, died in 1988 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988) at the age of 12 after what doctors initially described as an acute form of influenza (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza) but later changed to septic shock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septic_shock) after bacterial toxins invaded her bloodstream.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poltergeist_curse#cite_note-4) At the time, she had suffered acute (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_%28medical%29) bowel obstruction (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowel_obstruction), initially diagnosed as Crohn's disease (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crohn%27s_disease), which may have been the cause of death.
It definitely made me uncomfortable. Why, Craig T. Nelson, why?
JRR006
10-20-2008, 04:23 PM
I... don't know. A lot of people probably don't know she's dead? I didn't. I recognized they were spoofing a well-known horror movie but I'd never heard of Heather O'Rourke. It's somewhat odd, but no more so than using any other performance of a dead actor/actress.
pomeroy
10-20-2008, 04:30 PM
The creepiest ads were the ones where they used Orville Redenbacher.
3LRpUBUQ3sE
Food Nipple
10-20-2008, 04:45 PM
I guess I don't see the big deal. Are you offended by ads using living children or dead adults, or it a special case when you put the two together?
johnperkins21
10-20-2008, 04:53 PM
You probably aren't the only one, but I don't think it's a big deal at all. I don't even think it's a minor deal. She got paid for the gig, and now the production company owns the rights to that performance and can do with it what they wish.
Her line didn't change in the commercial, only Craig T. Nelson's did. So they were true to her original work. Not sure what's so sickening about it. Do you feel they're exploiting her death somehow to promote their product? I'd say the promos for cable news shows that talk about that missing girl (Caylee?) are more exploitative than this. They're actually exploiting the fact that she's missing and probably dead to sell their product whereas DirecTV is simply using a piece of art she created while alive.
Sazime
10-20-2008, 06:51 PM
If it was her ghost haunting Nelson, it'd be horrible. But it's not, it's based on Poltergeist and a famous scene. That's all.
Xerxes
10-21-2008, 12:48 AM
TSyGF4PqSI8
Never saw it until now, and I don't get it. He just changed his lines from the movie.
The advertisement was given the blessing from Heather's mother prior to conception and production of the ad. She considered it a tribute to her daughter.
Jeffool
10-21-2008, 12:54 AM
I dunno, it's not like they had the character say anything new. They weren't using 'her' as the spokesperson. I'm not offended by it.
Sandman
10-21-2008, 12:58 AM
It definitely made me uncomfortable. Why, Craig T. Nelson, why?
Because The District failed and re-runs of Poltergeist movies and Coach don't bring in the cash like they used to?
Xerxes
10-21-2008, 01:28 AM
Because The District failed and re-runs of Poltergeist movies and Coach don't bring in the cash like they used to?
You'd be surprised about the Coach money. :rolleyes:
Because The District failed and re-runs of Poltergeist movies and Coach don't bring in the cash like they used to?
He had the Incredibles though.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.